Staffing Details Of Mary Schapiro's $245 Million SEC Budget Increase Request May Be Unintentionally Revealing

Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:21
Staffing Details Of Mary Schapiro's $245 Million SEC Budget Increase Request May Be Unintentionally Revealing

Tags: Dodd-Frank

The SEC chief is sticking to her guns on why the regulator needs to hire 676 more people in the new fiscal year to fight everything from Ponzi schemes to the vagaries of money market funds.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


Mary Schapiro told the financial services panel of the House appropriations committee that the SEC enforcement and examination programs will get to hire most of the new staffers.


That makes a lot of sense, since it helps the regulator pursue its primary mandate of watching securities firms and stepping in when there's a problem.


There's plenty for those people to do. After all, the SEC ran on a budget of $1.3 billion last year, but obtained $2.8 billion in penalties, Schapiro says.


Enforcement actions against advisors surged 30% to a record 146 last year while broker-dealer enforcement activity increased 60% to 112.


Hiring another 191 people in enforcement would let the SEC catch up with the backlog of cases, theoretically getting investors who've been cheated since the 2008 credit crunch quicker satisfaction.


And adding 110 people to the trading, investment management, and risk divisions will help the SEC achieve its broadened post-Dodd-Frank responsibilities.


All of this is good.


But Schapiro says she wants to allocate $100 million to technology -- another good thing, in theory.


Maybe $50 million will come from the SEC's reserve funds, or maybe the entire $100 million will come out of the $245 million budget increase she wants Congress to approve. Her testimony gets vague on this point.


Give her the benefit of the doubt and say the entire $100 million comes out of the budget increase. She doesn't say anything about wanting to spend any of the $245 million on anything but technology and people, so that leaves Congress with the impression that $145 million will go straight to SEC HR.


That, in turn, would entail spending $215,000 on average for each of the 676 new employees, which is absurd by any standard.


It's more likely that the new hires will come in at slightly lower total compensation levels and the rest of the money will go toward salary increases for existing staff or to other SEC purposes.


That may or may not be what an already unsympathetic Congress wants to hear.


Meanwhile, Schapiro keeps stressing the importance of revamping the money markets and is silent on who will oversee street-level advisors. 






Comments (4)

Scott, reading the SEC's "In Brief - FY 2013 Congressional Justification" is insightful. To your point, on page 52 you can easily calculate that the average cost of an employee for salary and benefits in 2012 is $206,000. In 2013, she is proposing taking that up to $213,000. If you want to dig into another story, review the paragraph on page 17 of that document, disclosing $100M request for "obligations incurred in past fiscal years for ongoing multi-year real property contracts." Any guesses what that's for?
skips303 , March 08, 2012
Thanks for the lead! I figured there was a year-over-year comp available and will put together a follow-up really digging in.

I have a hunch where the extra $100 million comes in.
ScottMartin , March 08, 2012
so why does an agency like this have $50 million in 'reserves'? for what?
dmorton , March 08, 2012
Dodd-Frank lets them bank up to $100 million in registration fees and roll the money back into their operating budget. Looks like they already had $50 million in there.
ScottMartin , March 08, 2012

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.